A single- center retrospective cohort research examined the actual relationship between therapeutic drug monitoring and the antifungal medication posaconazole's clinical results
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62646/Keywords:
posaconazole, therapeutic drug monitoring, invasive fungal disease, prophylactic antifungal therapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantationAbstract
Patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) should take posaconazole as a first line of defense against invasive fungal disease (IFD). There is a lack of data on how therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) affects the prevention of IFD with posaconazole in retrospective investigations. Using real-world data, this research aimed to assess posaconazole's effectiveness, safety, and cost-efficiency in avoiding IFD.
Methods: Researchers from Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, which is affiliated with Shandong First Medical University, looked at posaconazole as a fungal prevention treatment for HSCT patients in this retrospective cohort research. Based on their TDM status, patients were categorized into two groups: TDM and non-TDM. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to examine clinical data in order to better understand the function of TDM in posaconazole prevention.
Conclusions: Following PSM, the prophylactic success rate was 100% in the TDM group compared to 52.9% in the non-TDM group (P = 0.003). Both groups had similar levels of gastrointestinal, liver, and kidney side effects (P > 0.05). When comparing the TDM group to the non-TDM group, we find that the former had reduced overall treatment costs and prescription costs.
In conclusion, real-world data show that TDM modestly lowers treatment costs and improves posaconazole's efficacy in avoiding IFD in HSCT patients.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.











